Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020³â 45±Ç 4È£ p.49 ~ 49
Garcia Paula Pontes, Cappoani Aline, Schelbauer Ricardo Susin, Correr Gisele Maria, Gonzaga Carla Castiglia,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Garcia Paula Pontes ) - Universidade Positivo Graduate Program in Dentistry School of Health Sciences
 ( Cappoani Aline ) - Universidade Positivo Graduate Program in Dentistry School of Health Sciences
 ( Schelbauer Ricardo Susin ) - Universidade Positivo Graduate Program in Dentistry School of Health Sciences
 ( Correr Gisele Maria ) - Universidade Positivo Graduate Program in Dentistry School of Health Sciences
 ( Gonzaga Carla Castiglia ) - Universidade Positivo Graduate Program in Dentistry School of Health Sciences

Abstract


Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic analysis of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored with cast metal posts (CMPs) or prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) and crowns.

Materials and Methods: Fifty ETT were restored with 25 CMPs and 25 GFPs at a private dental clinic between 2001 and 2016. The restorations consisted of 12 all-ceramic crowns, 31 metal-ceramic crowns, and 7 composite resin crowns. Demographic data, type of teeth, type of post-and-core system, time of placement, crown restorations, the number of proximal contacts, the type of antagonist, and reports of any complications after post-and-core placement were recorded for each patient. Assessments were performed at baseline (radiographic) and follow-up (radiographic and clinical). Data were analyzed by the McNemar test, the Pearson ¥ö2 test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves (¥á = 0.05). The mean follow-up was 67.6 months.

Results: No significant difference was observed for any of the radiographic parameters when the baseline and final radiographs were compared. In the clinical evaluation, anatomical form (p = 0.009) and occlusion (p = 0.001) showed significant differences according to the type of crown restoration; specifically, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns outperformed composite resin crowns.

Conclusions: CMPs and GFPs showed favorable results for restoring ETT after 6 years of follow-up. All-ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns showed higher survival rates and better clinical outcomes.

Å°¿öµå

Crowns; Post and core technique; Prosthodontics

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed